It is depressing how even “new” ideas labeled as punk, as in EduPunk, can quickly become mundane water cooler banter in this incestuous and quickly homogenizing edublog echo chamber. Like starving piranha we all latch on to the latest term, tool, or idea and beat it to death, till there is nothing left of it but a shell of the idea it once was or could have been. Then we champion the innovative century. Something is askew in my network, and I think it may need a little kick in the ass, that only anything labeled punk can give it.
I sit armed with a play list swarming with Fugazi, a chip on my shoulder, and a need to vent. Like many of you, I saw the term EduPunk for the first time on Twitter yesterday and took the bait. I followed a few links, googled some names, and by the end of the night I had added about ten new people to my network that seem to be more on my level than anyone in my pre-Edupunk network.
I am not here to out punk anyone or defend terms I had no hand in creating. I am also not here to cheerlead a group of people who could articulate their ideas much better than myself. This post is already one of many, probably too many, posts trying to attach meaning to a label. The creators of the term are probably sitting back and laughing at the direction their idea has taken. Some students are already angry that adults without their input are once again hijacking their movement.
But what I hope students like Lindsea will understand is that teaching is a political act. Whether you like it or not, every time you speak with, engage, instruct, interact with young people in an effort to promote their learning you are either consciously or subconsciously steering them toward the status quo or away from it. As our society becomes more and more global, at least for those of us lucky enough to be living on the comfortable side of the digital divide known as the first world, citizens are either becoming aware of their role as consumers in a resources depleting, imperialistic, war-mongering, poor exploiting, global economy or they are waking up to the idea that there are alternatives.
As educators we have a duty to either promote this brave new world, ignore it and stick to our curriculum, or to awaken young people to alternatives to the way things “just” are. With the birth of colonial expansion in Europe, then the industrial revolution, and ending with the rise of global capitalism “defeating” communism, we are constantly being told that since capitalism won the cold war, it is the best and only option. Never mind the constant state of war necessary to maintain it, or the depletion of unrenewable resources, or the unsustainably built into a system that exploits a large percentage of the global population for the benefit and profits of a tiny sub-group of ultra rich. We are constantly told that this state of globalization is the only game in town.
Teaching is a political act. So if we truly want change we must use any means necessary to break free of the chains being imposed on education. Enter EduPunk? Sure why not. Enter anything you can think of that will help us. The terms and labels are secondary to our primary concern, which is rethinking our educational institutions to reflect our revolutionary spirit, for both students and teachers.
Wikipedia tells us that punks sometimes participate in direct action such as protests and boycotts. These acts are committed in an effort to create social change when it is felt that the normal channels for change have been proven ineffective.
Let me repeat that: These acts are committed in an effort to create social change when it is felt that the normal channels for change have been proven ineffective. I am here to say that normal channels for change have been proven ineffective.
I leave you with a few questions:
What actions are you taking to help foster change in your classroom?
Are the normal channels proving difficult to overcome?
What new (call them whatever you want) techniques do you use?
Are you willing to not lead but listen and follow your students into the unknown
Listen and follow your students into the unknown? That is where you may find the meaning of Edupunk!
I agree that the edupunk is just other stuff rebranded. what is more interesting is the notion of open source and cooperative approaches. I think of all the so-called “new” approaches the only person who has had anything genuinely interesting, intelligent or meaningful to say is Mike Wesch. This is the only thing worthwhile I’ve read this year on teaching:
http://mediatedcultures.net/ksudigg/?p=168
Another name we give this is “radical pedagogy.” The first and foremost voice on this is Paolo Freire (my hero). Try and get ahold of this book of his before you leave for holiday. It’s slim. You can likely read it in a day or two. But powerful. It will blow your mind. You will love it.
http://www.amazon.com/Pedagogy-Indignation-Critical-Narrative/dp/1594510512
Pingback: And He Blogs » Seriously! Stop taking Edupunk so seriously
Kia Ora Jabiz!
I transcribe part of a comment that I raised on Nigel Robertson’s post on the same subject:
It must be my age, or perhaps some other disadvantage, but I can’t help getting a measure of deja vu.
I began my teaching way back in ‘69. They’d just put men on the Moon. Science was abuzz having enjoyed bumper years from the 50’s of BBC TV slots when Raymond Baxter, Carl Sagan, Jacob_Bronowski, Patrick_Moore and other enthusiastic exponents of the ‘modern’ scientific age were given prime time. Books were to be lauded. New books were it.
I’d had an experiential secondary education where my teachers encouraged me and my classmates to pick things to pieces – good old Scottish education but with a ‘modern’ pitch.
We would dismantle television sets and automobile engines, clocks, electric motors, reed organs, anything material that held a mystery. I got my degree from the university of life doing all of that and more.
Those were the days when boys knew the contents of a golf-ball like they did their fingernails, when students were encouraged to aim for the Moon or further. Models were built out of anything we could lay our hands on and used to give insight to what might be, not what’s supposed to be.
I feel at home with edupunk. There’s a grubbiness about it that smacks of the fundamental. Gone are the days of deliberating on the ‘black box’ lesson. Let’s not hang about. Where’s the can opener!
Ka kite
from Middle-earth
I think that edubloggers are too quick to dismiss ‘edupunk’ – I’d rather reform the movement then throw the whole thing away. As you’ve seen from blogs, educators trying to use new technologies to enhance the learning outcomes of their students. There is nothing wrong with that.
All catchphrases tied to movements are limiting. Many people fail to see the scope of what the Civil Rights Movement(s) were/are trying to accomplish. Grunge and punk movement lost their zest when radio and MTV announcers could label them easily.
The pillar behind ‘edupunk’ or any DIY movement must be changing the way students and teachers interact – classrooms should be interactive communities that are driven by the input of students. (http://educatorblog.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/edupunk-is-dead-already/)
Pingback: Recent URLs tagged Edupunk - Urlrecorder