Teachers Are Fighting

I recently read an article about a teacher’s union in New Zealand fighting new rules that could have teachers fired for online behavior.

Teachers are fighting to exclude their private lives – such as personal postings on Internet sites Bebo and Facebook – from falling foul of new serious misconduct rules. The Teachers Council wants to change criteria by which officials decide whether to refer complaints against the country’s 90,000 teachers to its disciplinary tribunal. The tribunal can censure or deregister teachers for serious misbehaviour. The council says the new clause – covering “any conduct
that brings, or is likely to bring, discredit to the profession” – would plug gaps in current rules. But teacher unions fear the “all encompassing” clause would put teachers’ personal lives under unfair scrutiny, even when it had no bearing on their ability to be good teachers.

As readers of this blog are aware, I have had my own troubles dealing with this issue of being asked to resign for my online behavior. For the last few weeks, I have often found myself saying, “This is a very grey area. Incidents like mine will occur more and more often as teachers and society at large start spending more time online.”

This problem is more than just a case of inappropriate applications on Facebook, the issue at hand is that as we enter a more open and global society with more and more people allowed to express themselves publicly on the internet, professionals especially those who work with children must decide how to best express themselves in a multi-cultural world.

Teachers already have to prove they are of fit character.

What does that mean? What is fit character is probably very different in New Zealand, or New York City, or the Middle East.

Post Primary Teachers Association president Robin Duff said current misconduct criteria were “perfectly adequate”. The new rule was too vague. “What’s creditable and discreditable these days? That sort of judgment is often based on your own social background.”

To what rubric are teachers being judged on appropriate online behavior. I think we can all agree that…

allegations of physical, sexual or psychological abuse of children; inappropriate pupil relationships; viewing pornography at school; using, making or supplying drugs; neglect or illtreatment of a child or animal in their care; or crimes punishable by at least three months’ jail.

…are unacceptable anywhere, but what about teachers who promote the theory of evolution over intelligent design, or teachers who have strong feelings about the war in Iraq? Suddenly, a teacher who is pro-active in politics can be deemed unfit by a school board, a principal, or a particular group of parents.Teachers are held to a higher standard for social behavior in nearly all cases. Which is fine to an extent. I understand the level of trust that is put in my hands on a daily basis. I will expect nothing less when my daughter goes to school, but as the 21st century really gets underway, we must move forward cautiously and not allow fear of unknown technologies dictate the level of freedoms we allow the men and women teaching our children.

The reality is that teachers are not robots. We function in the same social and intellectual spheres that govern the rest of the world. It is difficult enough to be everything to everyone else: the polite and professional coworker, the qualified and hardworking employee, the fair and kind role model for students, and the polished and respectful saint for parents.

I cannot think of another job, where a person is expected to always be on their “best” behavior. We are expected to remain blank slates that will somehow shape and build the future, without offering our own ideas so as not to improperly influence young minds, lest their parents’ opinions, or that of the school board or administration should differ from our own.

We live in an age where opinions and strong beliefs can be threatening to people in power. We are told from a young age not to discuss politics or religion in public. It is unprofessional we are led to believe. But as a language arts and social studies teacher how can I not? How are we meant to teach children that they can change the existing power structures and work towards a better world, if we are no allowed to discuss the flaws in the system?

Teachers are not meant to criticize a certain president or his policies, or question the global consumer culture, or suggest that perhaps capitalism is not the best system around. Some say this type of political criticism makes a teacher of unfit character. Don’t get me wrong. I whole-heartedly agree that this type of bias has no place in a classroom, especially at the middle school level. Teachers should not be sermonizing their religious or political beliefs in the classroom, but they shouldn’t be punished for expressing them on the Internet.

If we allow schools to start firing teachers for vague indications of inappropriateness, we are opening the door to weakened teacher’s unions and a generation of teachers afraid to take risks and be themselves.

There seems to be no place left for us teacher/activists to express our ideas. It doesn’t seem fair that we cannot feel comfortable expressing ourselves on the internet, the very space we are painstakingly teaching our students to use.

It feels very hypocritical to teach students to use the tools that we ourselves are afraid to use. I believe in education more than anything else in the world. I believe that objective presentation of facts, logical thought, honesty, love, and communication are the keys to a more peaceful world. A peaceful world is my only goal. If this attitude makes me of unfit character than I suppose I have to search the earth until I find a school that agrees with my ideals. Which is what I am doing now. I have no hidden agendas. No matter what political or religious obstacles we may face, I want nothing more than to find a path toward peace. This is why I teach. This is why I write. This is why I exist. My blogs are nothing more than maps of my journey. There may have been times I have taken wrong turns, said things I shouldn’t have said, but they are meant to be read as a whole. I do not believe in sermonizing or preaching in the classroom. While my opinions may appear to take a one-sided stand at times, I work very hard to create and maintain an objective environment to teach kids to ask questions and search out the truth. That is all.

So remember that not only are…

there’s lots of other things that happen in people’s lives that have no direct bearing on people’s ability to be good teachers. Certainly not the private life of a teacher unless it impacted on the profession itself.

Personal factors in a teacher’s life often enhance their ability to better relate to and teach students. We cannot allow these freedoms to be taken away.

2 thoughts on “Teachers Are Fighting

  1. Jenny Luca

    Hi Jabiz,
    Being a teacher is a difficult profession for many reasons. Our need to maintain a professional demeanor in both our public and private life is one of the many challenges we face. I’d like to be anonymous, but I live in close proximity to my workplace and often see my students and their families in my ‘down’ time. Writing a blog also puts me out there -my school is supportive of my blogging and encourage our parent community to read it. My public face is always on and I am very conscious of this. I don’t resent it, I just think it comes with the territory. I wish you well as you continue to blog- I admire the fact that you are exploring new avenues without a formal classroom. I hope that you find your way back to one – your passion is evident and students always benefit from teachers with passion.

    Reply
  2. Ken Allan

    Kia Ora Jabiz.

    You say “it feels hypocritical to teach students to use the tools that we ourselves (as teachers) are afraid to use”. I feel the same way you do.

    My understanding is that this has been happening for a long time in many western societies. It is becoming part of the postmodern culture, a facet of present day culture that denies people to think for themselves, or even, as in the case of teachers, to have a life of their own. This seems trite until one thinks of what is expected of teachers – and this comes not just from society but also from teachers.

    I’ve often heard it said that the expectations that society has of teachers are tending towards a 24/7 commitment, which in itself suggests a denial that teachers have a right to a life of their own. Strange though it may seem, it is often thought that teachers should also be seen to be behaving responsibly 24/7- that their vocation (for that’s how many see it) is such that teachers must transcend humanness. I don’t believe that it should have to transcend humanness.

    But there are societal things that tend to contribute to this attitude, owned by many, that teachers should be ‘above’ certain behaviour that society accepts from people in other occupations as being perfectly ‘human’. It especially relates to behaviour that is or tends to be thought of as criminal, or that can be associated as being related to criminal behaviour – and not without good reason.

    This has been the case for a very long time. It is to do with an idealisation in the minds of those who view teachers as having ‘position’ in society. Hard though it may be to accept, it is similar in many ways to the expectations one might have of a mountaineer. Mountaineers are supposed to be agile in the use of their limbs to perform their vocation. But when the mountaineer makes a mistake, the result can sometimes be fatal.

    Ka kite
    from Middle-earth

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *